English 
español 
française 
italiano 
deutsche 
日本語 
polski 
česky 
svenska 
Türkçe 
Nederlands 
"Subdue" vs. "conquer": two sides of control
Lloyd Cooper 30/10/2024, 21:22
What is similar?
Both "subdue" and "conquer" involve overcoming resistance, gaining control or exerting power over something or someone. They are often used in contexts where force, persuasion, or effort is applied to overcome an obstacle.
What is different?
"Subdue" often implies calming, pacifying, or bringing something under control, often in a less aggressive or forceful manner. It can imply making something less intense or noticeable. "Conquer" generally implies a more decisive and often forceful victory over something, often with a sense of total control or defeat of an adversary. "Conquer" is often used in the context of warfare or complete overcoming.
Which one is more common?
Examples of usage
Subdue- The firefighters worked hard to subdue the flames.
- She managed to subdue her anger before speaking.
- The army attempted to subdue the rebellion with minimal violence.
- The Romans set out to conquer vast territories.
- He conquered his fear of heights by taking small steps.
- The company aims to conquer the European market with its new product.
Recommended posts in 
Difference
"Rust" vs. "corrode": nature's process in words
Rust specifically refers to the oxidation of iron or iron ... Learn more →
"Fame" vs. "publicity": two sides of the spotlight
Fame refers to being widely known and often admired or ... Learn more →
"Indisputable" vs. "irrefutable": a study in certainty
The word "indisputable" often suggests that something is so clear ... Learn more →
"Blend" vs. "mixture": stirring up the subtle differences
A "blend" often implies a more seamless or smooth integration ... Learn more →