en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Comparing control: "totalitarianism" vs. "authoritarianism"

Lloyd Cooper 06/11/2024, 03:19
English.me team member
Totalitarianism and authoritarianism. What's the difference?

What is similar?

Both totalitarianism and authoritarianism refer to forms of government that concentrate power in the hands of a leader or a small elite that is not constitutionally responsible to the public. They both suppress political dissent and limit individual freedoms. Both systems often employ propaganda and control over the media to maintain their power.

What is different?

Totalitarianism is an extreme form of authoritarianism characterized by an attempt to control all aspects of life, including the economy, education, art, science, and private life. A totalitarian regime seeks to dominate every aspect of social and political life to an unprecedented degree. Authoritarianism, on the other hand, is marked by strong central power and limited political freedoms but may allow some individual and social freedoms, provided they do not threaten the regime. In authoritarian systems, political control is paramount, but total domination over all aspects of society as seen in totalitarianism is not necessarily pursued.

Which one is more common?

Internet search results for totalitarianism) and authoritarianism

Examples of usage

Totalitarianism
  • The regime's totalitarian approach meant that every aspect of the citizens" lives was under strict control.
  • In a totalitarian state, dissent is not tolerated, and citizens are often subject to intense propaganda.
  • Literature in the totalitarian society was heavily censored and used as a tool for indoctrination.
Authoritarianism
  • Under the authoritarian government, political opposition was suppressed, but people still engaged in vibrant cultural activities.
  • Authoritarianism can sometimes lead to stability, but it often does so at the cost of personal freedoms.
  • Despite the authoritarian leadership, the country saw economic growth and infrastructure development.