en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Brimming over: debunking the "chalk full" error

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 05/10/2024, 20:55
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Chalk full or chock-full. What's correct?

Spelling and usage error

Why do people make this mistake?

People make the error because "chalk" and "chock" are homophones in some dialects, leading to confusion in spelling.

What is correct?

The correct expression is "chock-full", which means "full to overflowing" or "crammed/stuffed tightly." It's derived from the Old English word "chokkeful", meaning "crammed full".

Examples of correct usage

  • The basket was chock-full of ripe apples.
  • After the storm, the gutters were chock-full of leaves and debris.
  • The concert hall was chock-full of eager fans.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "holding the reigns" misspells the equine expression

Why "holding the reigns" misspells the equine expression

People make this error because "reign" and "rein" are homophones, ... Learn more →

Beyond the brackets: why "a parentheses" is a mistake

Beyond the brackets: why "a parentheses" is a mistake

People often confuse the singular and plural forms of words, ... Learn more →

Why "maschine" doesn't work in English

Why "maschine" doesn't work in English

People may spell "machine" as "maschine" because "Maschine" is the ... Learn more →

Unlocking the truth: why "key note" is a common mistake

Unlocking the truth: why "key note" is a common mistake

People often confuse "key note" with "keynote", as they might ... Learn more →