English 
español 
française 
italiano 
deutsche 
日本語 
polski 
česky 
svenska 
Türkçe 
Nederlands 
Brimming over: debunking the "chalk full" error
Lloyd Cooper 05/10/2024, 20:55English.me team member
What kind of error is it?
Spelling and usage error
Why do people make this mistake?
People make the error because "chalk" and "chock" are homophones in some dialects, leading to confusion in spelling.
What is correct?
The correct expression is "chock-full", which means "full to overflowing" or "crammed/stuffed tightly." It's derived from the Old English word "chokkeful", meaning "crammed full".
Examples of correct usage
- The basket was chock-full of ripe apples.
- After the storm, the gutters were chock-full of leaves and debris.
- The concert hall was chock-full of eager fans.
Recommended posts in 
Grammar
Why "had tore" tears grammar apart: a common mistake explained
The error occurs because "tore" is mistaken as the past ... Learn more →
Why "alongside with" doesn't stand together
People mistakenly believe that "alongside" and "with" together emphasize their ... Learn more →
Why "she seen" shouldn't be seen: exploring common grammar pitfalls
People often make this error because "seen" is the past ... Learn more →
Worse yet: why "more worse" is the worst
People make this error when they try to add emphasis ... Learn more →