en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Brimming over: debunking the "chalk full" error

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 05/10/2024, 20:55
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Chalk full or chock-full. What's correct?

Spelling and usage error

Why do people make this mistake?

People make the error because "chalk" and "chock" are homophones in some dialects, leading to confusion in spelling.

What is correct?

The correct expression is "chock-full", which means "full to overflowing" or "crammed/stuffed tightly." It's derived from the Old English word "chokkeful", meaning "crammed full".

Examples of correct usage

  • The basket was chock-full of ripe apples.
  • After the storm, the gutters were chock-full of leaves and debris.
  • The concert hall was chock-full of eager fans.

Recommended posts in Grammar

What leads to the belief that back peddle is correct?

What leads to the belief that back peddle is correct?

People make this error because "pedal" and "peddle" are homophones—they ... Learn more →

Why "ment" steers us wrong: the linguistic perspective

Why "ment" steers us wrong: the linguistic perspective

People might make this error due to the similarity between ... Learn more →

Aim for precision: why "principle aim" misses the mark

Aim for precision: why "principle aim" misses the mark

People often make this error because the words "principle" and ... Learn more →

Why 'occurred' needs two 'r's: a spelling insight

Why 'occurred' needs two 'r's: a spelling insight

The word "occurred" is often misspelled as "occured" because people ... Learn more →