en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "could of" is a language blunder you shouldn't make

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 18:20
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Could of or could have [verb]. What's correct?

Grammatical and orthographic error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error due to mishearing or misinterpreting the contraction "could've," which combines "could" and "have." When spoken quickly, "could've" sounds very similar to "could of," leading to the incorrect spelling.

What is correct?

"Could have" or its contraction "could've" is the correct form to use, as "have" is the auxiliary verb needed to form the present perfect tense.

Examples of correct usage

  • I could have gone to the party.
  • She could've been there earlier.
  • They could have helped if we asked.

Recommended posts in Grammar

The singular misstep: why "a women" is not correct

The singular misstep: why "a women" is not correct

People may mistakenly use "a women" because they confuse the ... Learn more →

Waking up to grammar: why "laying awake" is a mistake

Waking up to grammar: why "laying awake" is a mistake

People often confuse "lay" and "lie" because their past tenses ... Learn more →

Brought to light: why "has brung" misses the mark

Brought to light: why "has brung" misses the mark

People often incorrectly apply regular verb conjugation rules or misunderstand ... Learn more →

Why "has came" is incorrect: understanding proper verb tense usage

Why "has came" is incorrect: understanding proper verb tense usage

People might make this error due to confusion between the ... Learn more →