en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "could of" is a language blunder you shouldn't make

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 18:20
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Could of or could have [verb]. What's correct?

Grammatical and orthographic error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error due to mishearing or misinterpreting the contraction "could've," which combines "could" and "have." When spoken quickly, "could've" sounds very similar to "could of," leading to the incorrect spelling.

What is correct?

"Could have" or its contraction "could've" is the correct form to use, as "have" is the auxiliary verb needed to form the present perfect tense.

Examples of correct usage

  • I could have gone to the party.
  • She could've been there earlier.
  • They could have helped if we asked.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "laying on the couch" doesn't sit right

Why "laying on the couch" doesn't sit right

The error stems from the confusion between the verbs "lay" ... Learn more →

Why "contains of" is an linguistic slip: the art of precise language use

Why "contains of" is an linguistic slip: the art of precise language use

People often make this error because they try to construct ... Learn more →

Small word, big mistake: the "miniscule" error

Small word, big mistake: the "miniscule" error

People often assume the word is related to the prefix ... Learn more →

The reason "it weights" doesn't hold up

The reason "it weights" doesn't hold up

People may incorrectly use "weights" instead of "weighs" because they ... Learn more →