Play GamesMy progressVocabulary testSettings
en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Please, sign up or log in to not lose your learning progress!

Why "could of" is a language blunder you shouldn't make

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 18:20
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Could of or could have [verb]. What's correct?

Grammatical and orthographic error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error due to mishearing or misinterpreting the contraction "could've," which combines "could" and "have." When spoken quickly, "could've" sounds very similar to "could of," leading to the incorrect spelling.

What is correct?

"Could have" or its contraction "could've" is the correct form to use, as "have" is the auxiliary verb needed to form the present perfect tense.

Examples of correct usage

  • I could have gone to the party.
  • She could've been there earlier.
  • They could have helped if we asked.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "buyed" isn't in your dictionary

Why "buyed" isn't in your dictionary

People might use "buyed" by applying a regular past tense ... Learn more →

Why it's 'headstone,' not "head stone": unveiling a common error

Why it's 'headstone,' not "head stone": unveiling a common error

People might make this error due to misunderstanding or misspelling ... Learn more →

What’s the issue with saying the extend?

What’s the issue with saying the extend?

People often confuse "extend" and "extent" because they sound similar ... Learn more →

Why you should hit the 'brakes', not the 'breaks'

Why you should hit the 'brakes', not the 'breaks'

"Breaks" and "brakes" are homophones, meaning they sound the same ... Learn more →