en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "could of" is a language blunder you shouldn't make

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 18:20
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Could of or could have [verb]. What's correct?

Grammatical and orthographic error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error due to mishearing or misinterpreting the contraction "could've," which combines "could" and "have." When spoken quickly, "could've" sounds very similar to "could of," leading to the incorrect spelling.

What is correct?

"Could have" or its contraction "could've" is the correct form to use, as "have" is the auxiliary verb needed to form the present perfect tense.

Examples of correct usage

  • I could have gone to the party.
  • She could've been there earlier.
  • They could have helped if we asked.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "some one" is written as one: breaking down a common mistake

Why "some one" is written as one: breaking down a common mistake

People often mistakenly think that "someone" needs to be separated ... Learn more →

Why "it was him who" gets it wrong

Why "it was him who" gets it wrong

People often make this error because "him" is commonly used ... Learn more →

Understanding the error: why "have went" is incorrect

Understanding the error: why "have went" is incorrect

People often confuse the forms of irregular verbs, especially with ... Learn more →

Exposing the error: "bare witness" vs. 'bear witness'

Exposing the error: "bare witness" vs. 'bear witness'

People often confuse "bare" with "bear" because they are homophones—words ... Learn more →