English 
español 
française 
italiano 
deutsche 
日本語 
polski 
česky 
svenska 
Türkçe 
Nederlands 
Why "could of" is a language blunder you shouldn't make
Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 18:20English.me team member
What kind of error is it?
![Could of or could have [verb]. What's correct?](/know/grammar/images/could_of.jpg "Why \"could of\" is a language blunder you shouldn't make")
Grammatical and orthographic error
Why do people make this mistake?
People often make this error due to mishearing or misinterpreting the contraction "could've," which combines "could" and "have." When spoken quickly, "could've" sounds very similar to "could of," leading to the incorrect spelling.
What is correct?
"Could have" or its contraction "could've" is the correct form to use, as "have" is the auxiliary verb needed to form the present perfect tense.
Examples of correct usage
- I could have gone to the party.
- She could've been there earlier.
- They could have helped if we asked.
Recommended posts in 
Grammar
The curious misstep: why "since many years" misses the mark
"Since many years" combines "since," which is used with specific ... Learn more →
Why "frosen" isn't a proper past tense for "freeze"
People may forget that it is the past participle tense ... Learn more →
Why "had ran" doesn't run in proper English
People often confuse the past tense with the past participle ... Learn more →
Why "alongside with" doesn't stand together
People mistakenly believe that "alongside" and "with" together emphasize their ... Learn more →