en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 02/10/2024, 19:45
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had mislead or had misled. What's correct?

It's a verb tense error related to the misuse of the past participle form of the verb "mislead". The correct past participle is "misled", not "mislead".

Why do people make this mistake?

People might make this error because "lead" and "read" in their present tenses change to "led" and "read" for both their past and past participle forms, respectively, which can be confusing. The similarity in sound between "mislead" (pronounced "mis-leed") and "misled" (pronounced "miz-led") might also contribute to the mistake.

What is correct?

The correct past participle form of "mislead" is "misled". Therefore, the correct phrase is "had misled".

Examples of correct usage

  • She realized that the advertisement had misled her.
  • He had misled the team with false information.
  • They claimed the map had misled them during the hike.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "temporary closed" is incorrect and what to use instead

Why "temporary closed" is incorrect and what to use instead

People may confuse the adjective "temporary" with the adverb "temporarily". ... Learn more →

Avoiding "a one of the" wrong article use

Avoiding "a one of the" wrong article use

People may make this error due to confusion about article ... Learn more →

Why "it was him who" gets it wrong

Why "it was him who" gets it wrong

People often make this error because "him" is commonly used ... Learn more →

Why you should hit the 'brakes', not the 'breaks'

Why you should hit the 'brakes', not the 'breaks'

"Breaks" and "brakes" are homophones, meaning they sound the same ... Learn more →