en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 02/10/2024, 19:45
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had mislead or had misled. What's correct?

It's a verb tense error related to the misuse of the past participle form of the verb "mislead". The correct past participle is "misled", not "mislead".

Why do people make this mistake?

People might make this error because "lead" and "read" in their present tenses change to "led" and "read" for both their past and past participle forms, respectively, which can be confusing. The similarity in sound between "mislead" (pronounced "mis-leed") and "misled" (pronounced "miz-led") might also contribute to the mistake.

What is correct?

The correct past participle form of "mislead" is "misled". Therefore, the correct phrase is "had misled".

Examples of correct usage

  • She realized that the advertisement had misled her.
  • He had misled the team with false information.
  • They claimed the map had misled them during the hike.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "to chose" is never the right choice

Why "to chose" is never the right choice

People often mistake the base form "choose" with the past ... Learn more →

Why "soar cream" isn't on the menu

Why "soar cream" isn't on the menu

The error likely arises from mishearing or mispronouncing "sour cream" ... Learn more →

Imminent mistake: understanding the error in "imminent domain"

Imminent mistake: understanding the error in "imminent domain"

People often mishear or misinterpret the term "eminent domain" due ... Learn more →

Why "maschine" doesn't work in English

Why "maschine" doesn't work in English

People may spell "machine" as "maschine" because "Maschine" is the ... Learn more →