English 
español 
française 
italiano 
deutsche 
日本語 
polski 
česky 
svenska 
Türkçe 
Nederlands 
The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray
Lloyd Cooper 02/10/2024, 19:45
What kind of error is it?
It's a verb tense error related to the misuse of the past participle form of the verb "mislead". The correct past participle is "misled", not "mislead".
Why do people make this mistake?
People might make this error because "lead" and "read" in their present tenses change to "led" and "read" for both their past and past participle forms, respectively, which can be confusing. The similarity in sound between "mislead" (pronounced "mis-leed") and "misled" (pronounced "miz-led") might also contribute to the mistake.
What is correct?
The correct past participle form of "mislead" is "misled". Therefore, the correct phrase is "had misled".
Examples of correct usage
- She realized that the advertisement had misled her.
- He had misled the team with false information.
- They claimed the map had misled them during the hike.
Recommended posts in 
Grammar
Why "and etc." is a double trouble mistake
People often use "and etc." thinking it emphasizes the list's ... Learn more →
Why "each criteria" needs its own singular story
The confusion typically arises because people don't recognize "criteria" as ... Learn more →
Why "expresso" isn't a legit brew
The error likely arises from the influence of the English ... Learn more →
Why "your welcome" doesn't quite greet correctly
People often hear the phrase "you're welcome" in spoken English ... Learn more →