en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 02/10/2024, 19:45
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had mislead or had misled. What's correct?

It's a verb tense error related to the misuse of the past participle form of the verb "mislead". The correct past participle is "misled", not "mislead".

Why do people make this mistake?

People might make this error because "lead" and "read" in their present tenses change to "led" and "read" for both their past and past participle forms, respectively, which can be confusing. The similarity in sound between "mislead" (pronounced "mis-leed") and "misled" (pronounced "miz-led") might also contribute to the mistake.

What is correct?

The correct past participle form of "mislead" is "misled". Therefore, the correct phrase is "had misled".

Examples of correct usage

  • She realized that the advertisement had misled her.
  • He had misled the team with false information.
  • They claimed the map had misled them during the hike.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Brought to light: why "has brung" misses the mark

Brought to light: why "has brung" misses the mark

People often incorrectly apply regular verb conjugation rules or misunderstand ... Learn more →

Faint praise for "feint praise": a slip of the tongue

Faint praise for "feint praise": a slip of the tongue

People mix up "feint" and "faint" because they sound similar, ... Learn more →

Why "filled a lawsuit" won’t hold up in court

Why "filled a lawsuit" won’t hold up in court

This error may arise from a typographical mistake or a ... Learn more →

Why "was wrote" strikes the wrong chord in english

Why "was wrote" strikes the wrong chord in english

People often get confused with English past tense structures and ... Learn more →