en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 02/10/2024, 19:45
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had mislead or had misled. What's correct?

It's a verb tense error related to the misuse of the past participle form of the verb "mislead". The correct past participle is "misled", not "mislead".

Why do people make this mistake?

People might make this error because "lead" and "read" in their present tenses change to "led" and "read" for both their past and past participle forms, respectively, which can be confusing. The similarity in sound between "mislead" (pronounced "mis-leed") and "misled" (pronounced "miz-led") might also contribute to the mistake.

What is correct?

The correct past participle form of "mislead" is "misled". Therefore, the correct phrase is "had misled".

Examples of correct usage

  • She realized that the advertisement had misled her.
  • He had misled the team with false information.
  • They claimed the map had misled them during the hike.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "expresso" isn't a legit brew

Why "expresso" isn't a legit brew

The error likely arises from the influence of the English ... Learn more →

The hidden cost of saying "scotch free"

The hidden cost of saying "scotch free"

People often make this error because "scotch" sounds similar to ... Learn more →

Famous mistake: why "is renown for" is incorrect

Famous mistake: why "is renown for" is incorrect

The error arises from confusion between the noun "renown" and ... Learn more →

Exploring the common misstep behind "way side"

Exploring the common misstep behind "way side"

People may confuse "way side" with "wayside", possibly thinking of ... Learn more →