en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

The misheard past: unraveling the "might of" confusion

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 30/09/2024, 22:40
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Might of or might have. What's correct?

Grammar error, specifically a homophonic or misinterpretation error.

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error because "might of" is pronounced similarly to the contraction "might've" (short for "might have"), leading to confusion in writing.

What is correct?

The correct expression is "might have," which is used to indicate possibility or potentiality in the past or hypothetical situations.

Examples of correct usage

  • She might have gone to the store.
  • They might have known the answer.
  • I might have forgotten to lock the door.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "more better" isn't better

Why "more better" isn't better

People sometimes add "more" before "better" to intensify it, not ... Learn more →

Why "blatent" is a blatant blunder

Why "blatent" is a blatant blunder

People often confuse the suffixes "-ant" and "-ent" because they ... Learn more →

Why it's 'headstone,' not "head stone": unveiling a common error

Why it's 'headstone,' not "head stone": unveiling a common error

People might make this error due to misunderstanding or misspelling ... Learn more →

Why we should say "several" instead of "a several"

Why we should say "several" instead of "a several"

People sometimes confuse the use of "a" and "several". "A" ... Learn more →