en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

The misheard past: unraveling the "might of" confusion

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 30/09/2024, 22:40
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Might of or might have. What's correct?

Grammar error, specifically a homophonic or misinterpretation error.

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error because "might of" is pronounced similarly to the contraction "might've" (short for "might have"), leading to confusion in writing.

What is correct?

The correct expression is "might have," which is used to indicate possibility or potentiality in the past or hypothetical situations.

Examples of correct usage

  • She might have gone to the store.
  • They might have known the answer.
  • I might have forgotten to lock the door.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "back and fourth" is incorrect: common misstep in English

Why "back and fourth" is incorrect: common misstep in English

People often make this error because the word "fourth" is ... Learn more →

Why "ground work" lays the wrong foundation

Why "ground work" lays the wrong foundation

People mistakenly separate the compound word "groundwork" into two words, ... Learn more →

The hidden cost of saying "scotch free"

The hidden cost of saying "scotch free"

People often make this error because "scotch" sounds similar to ... Learn more →

How "diffuse the situation" spreads confusion, not calm

How "diffuse the situation" spreads confusion, not calm

People often confuse "diffuse" with "defuse" because they sound similar ... Learn more →