en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "shouldn't of" shouldn't be

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 04/11/2024, 03:38
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Shouldn't of or shouldn't have. What's correct?

Grammatical error due to homophonic confusion

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error because "shouldn't of" sounds like the correct "shouldn't have" when spoken quickly, leading to a misunderstanding of the contraction "shouldn't".

What is correct?

"Shouldn't have" is the correct form, where "shouldn't" is a contraction of "should not" followed by "have", which is needed to form the perfect tense.

Examples of correct usage

  • You shouldn't have left the door open.
  • They shouldn't have eaten all the cake.
  • She shouldn't have told him the secret.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why you should never "give advise": common language misstep explained

Why you should never "give advise": common language misstep explained

People often confuse "advise" and "advice" because they sound similar ... Learn more →

Why "frosen" isn't a proper past tense for "freeze"

Why "frosen" isn't a proper past tense for "freeze"

People may forget that it is the past participle tense ... Learn more →

Why "greater then" is less than perfect: a grammar insight

Why "greater then" is less than perfect: a grammar insight

People often confuse the spelling of "than" and "then" due ... Learn more →

Why "a lose" is not a win for your grammar

Why "a lose" is not a win for your grammar

People often mistakenly use "lose" as a noun due to ... Learn more →