en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "was sang" strikes a false note

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 21/10/2024, 04:35
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Was sang or was sung. What's correct?

It is an error in verb conjugation, specifically the misuse of passive voice and tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error by confusing verb forms and constructing sentences that attempt to use the passive voice incorrectly. It involves misapplying the past participle "sung" and the past tense "sang" in places where they do not fit grammatically.

What is correct?

"Sang" is the simple past tense of the verb "sing". The correct past participle verb form required for passive constructions is "sung". The passive voice should involve a form of "to be" and the past participle; thus, "was sung" is correct.

Examples of correct usage

  • The song was sung by the choir.
  • The anthem was sung beautifully.
  • The opera was sung in Italian.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "temporary closed" is incorrect and what to use instead

Why "temporary closed" is incorrect and what to use instead

People may confuse the adjective "temporary" with the adverb "temporarily". ... Learn more →

The siege of "seige": a common slip-up in writing

The siege of "seige": a common slip-up in writing

The error occurs because of the confusion in vowel order, ... Learn more →

Mind the gap: why "be ware" isn't right

Mind the gap: why "be ware" isn't right

The phrase "be ware" is an incorrect attempt to spell ... Learn more →

Why "under going" is incorrect and how to use 'undergoing' properly

Why "under going" is incorrect and how to use 'undergoing' properly

The error "under going" is typically made due to the ... Learn more →