en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "was sang" strikes a false note

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 21/10/2024, 04:35
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Was sang or was sung. What's correct?

It is an error in verb conjugation, specifically the misuse of passive voice and tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error by confusing verb forms and constructing sentences that attempt to use the passive voice incorrectly. It involves misapplying the past participle "sung" and the past tense "sang" in places where they do not fit grammatically.

What is correct?

"Sang" is the simple past tense of the verb "sing". The correct past participle verb form required for passive constructions is "sung". The passive voice should involve a form of "to be" and the past participle; thus, "was sung" is correct.

Examples of correct usage

  • The song was sung by the choir.
  • The anthem was sung beautifully.
  • The opera was sung in Italian.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Exposing the error: "bare witness" vs. 'bear witness'

Exposing the error: "bare witness" vs. 'bear witness'

People often confuse "bare" with "bear" because they are homophones—words ... Learn more →

Why "itself" stands alone: unpacking a common mistake

Why "itself" stands alone: unpacking a common mistake

People might mistakenly add a space due to misunderstanding "itself" ... Learn more →

Mind the gap: why "lack there of" lacks everything

Mind the gap: why "lack there of" lacks everything

People often make this error because they are trying to ... Learn more →

Why "having began" doesn't begin correctly

Why "having began" doesn't begin correctly

People often mistake "began" as the past participle form of ... Learn more →