en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "was sang" strikes a false note

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 21/10/2024, 04:35
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Was sang or was sung. What's correct?

It is an error in verb conjugation, specifically the misuse of passive voice and tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error by confusing verb forms and constructing sentences that attempt to use the passive voice incorrectly. It involves misapplying the past participle "sung" and the past tense "sang" in places where they do not fit grammatically.

What is correct?

"Sang" is the simple past tense of the verb "sing". The correct past participle verb form required for passive constructions is "sung". The passive voice should involve a form of "to be" and the past participle; thus, "was sung" is correct.

Examples of correct usage

  • The song was sung by the choir.
  • The anthem was sung beautifully.
  • The opera was sung in Italian.

Recommended posts in Grammar

How "diffuse the situation" spreads confusion, not calm

How "diffuse the situation" spreads confusion, not calm

People often confuse "diffuse" with "defuse" because they sound similar ... Learn more →

Why "had broke" breaks grammar rules

Why "had broke" breaks grammar rules

People often confuse past tense forms with past participle forms, ... Learn more →

Why "there's two" doesn't count: a grammar guide

Why "there's two" doesn't count: a grammar guide

People often use "there's" (contraction of "there is") informally without ... Learn more →

The sudden truth about "all the sudden"

The sudden truth about "all the sudden"

People often mishear or conflate "all of a sudden" as ... Learn more →