en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "was sang" strikes a false note

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 21/10/2024, 04:35
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Was sang or was sung. What's correct?

It is an error in verb conjugation, specifically the misuse of passive voice and tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People often make this error by confusing verb forms and constructing sentences that attempt to use the passive voice incorrectly. It involves misapplying the past participle "sung" and the past tense "sang" in places where they do not fit grammatically.

What is correct?

"Sang" is the simple past tense of the verb "sing". The correct past participle verb form required for passive constructions is "sung". The passive voice should involve a form of "to be" and the past participle; thus, "was sung" is correct.

Examples of correct usage

  • The song was sung by the choir.
  • The anthem was sung beautifully.
  • The opera was sung in Italian.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "old fashion way" isn't quite right

Why "old fashion way" isn't quite right

People might make this error due to a misunderstanding or ... Learn more →

Debunking "comprised solely of": why this phrase doesn't add up

Debunking "comprised solely of": why this phrase doesn't add up

People often use "comprised of" thinking it is synonymous with ... Learn more →

Why "head quarters" needs a space makeover

Why "head quarters" needs a space makeover

Some people mistakenly treat "headquarters" as two separate words, possibly ... Learn more →

Why "standart" stumbles: understanding the error

Why "standart" stumbles: understanding the error

The error "standart" likely arises due to the influence of ... Learn more →