en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Correcting the chaos: why "wreck havoc" is a language misstep

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 21/10/2024, 07:08
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Wreck havoc or wreak havoc. What's correct?

Spelling and idiomatic expression error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often confuse "wreck" with "wreak" because they sound somewhat similar and are both associated with destructive actions. The phrase "wreck havoc" seems to make intuitive sense to some, as "wreck" means to cause destruction.

What is correct?

The correct expression is "wreak havoc", where "wreak" means to cause or inflict, particularly in the context of causing chaos or destruction.

Examples of correct usage

  • The storm will wreak havoc on the coastal villages.
  • Decisions made in haste may wreak havoc on the company's future.
  • The virus wreaked havoc across the entire population.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Understanding why "for awhile" is incorrect

Understanding why "for awhile" is incorrect

The error occurs because "awhile" and "a while" sound similar ... Learn more →

Why "old fashion way" isn't quite right

Why "old fashion way" isn't quite right

People might make this error due to a misunderstanding or ... Learn more →

Why "has fell" falls short: a guide to correct usage

Why "has fell" falls short: a guide to correct usage

People often mistake the past participle "fallen" with the simple ... Learn more →

Why "after been" is incorrect: a linguistic insight

Why "after been" is incorrect: a linguistic insight

People often confuse verb forms and may mistakenly use "been" ... Learn more →