English 
español 
française 
italiano 
deutsche 
日本語 
polski 
česky 
svenska 
Türkçe 
Nederlands 
"Smother" vs. "suffocate": when words take your breath away
Lloyd Cooper 17/12/2024, 20:23
What is similar?
Both "smother" and "suffocate" involve causing difficulty in breathing due to obstruction or lack of air. They can be used literally to describe physical situations where breathing is hindered, and figuratively to express feelings of being overwhelmed or oppressed.
What is different?
"Smother" often implies covering something completely, which can lead to suffocation, but it also means overwhelming someone with excessive attention, affection, or elements. It has a broader usage, encompassing both positive and negative contexts. "Suffocate" specifically refers to the inability to breathe due to lack of air or obstruction and is primarily used in negative contexts to describe situations where someone or something is deprived of air or freedom.
Which one is more common?
Examples of usage
Smother- She used a blanket to smother the fire.
- His mother tended to smother him with affection.
- The dense fog seemed to smother the entire town.
- The trapped miners feared they would suffocate without proper ventilation.
- She felt like she was going to suffocate in the cramped, crowded room.
- Plants can suffocate if their roots are waterlogged and lack access to oxygen.
Recommended posts in 
Difference
"Waver" vs. "fluctuate": navigating nuances in change
Waver often implies hesitation or lack of a firm decision, ... Learn more →
"Hoodwink" vs. "deceive": shades of deception
"Hoodwink" often implies tricking someone through cunning, deception, or false ... Learn more →
"Cosmic" vs. "stellar": exploring the universe of words
The word "cosmic" is broader in scope and can refer ... Learn more →
Joy in words: examining "entertaining" vs. "delightful"
Entertaining suggests amusement or interest, while delightful implies great pleasure ... Learn more →