English 
español 
française 
italiano 
deutsche 
日本語 
polski 
česky 
svenska 
Türkçe 
Nederlands 
"Trite" vs. "hackneyed": the battle of the bland and boring!
Lloyd Cooper 16/10/2024, 15:15
What is similar?
Both "trite" and "hackneyed" refer to ideas, expressions, or elements that are overused and lacking in originality or freshness. They often imply that something is clichéd and no longer interesting due to excessive repetition.
What is different?
While both words indicate overuse, "trite" usually emphasizes the lack of freshness or novelty, suggesting something is worn out and common. "Hackneyed" focuses more on the idea being clichéd or predictable due to constant repetition. "Trite" can apply to many forms of expressions and situations, while "hackneyed" is often used specifically in the context of phrases or ideas, especially in literature or speech.
Which one is more common?
Examples of usage
Trite- Her writing was full of trite expressions that did nothing to engage the reader.
- The movie's plot was extremely trite, offering nothing new to the genre.
- His apology felt trite and insincere, as if he had said the same words many times before.
- The film's storyline was hackneyed, relying on old tropes that everyone had seen before.
- His speech was filled with hackneyed phrases that failed to inspire the audience.
- Critics panned the book for its hackneyed dialogue and predictable plot.
Recommended posts in 
Difference
"Refuse" vs. "reject": exploring the nuances of denial
The word "refuse" can imply a personal decision or denial, ... Learn more →
Blink of an eye: "nanosecond" vs "millisecond" in the world of seconds
A nanosecond is one billionth (1/1,000,000,000) of a second, while ... Learn more →
"Translator" vs. "interpreter": bridging the language gap
A "translator" typically works with written text, converting documents from ... Learn more →
Softening the impact: "downplay" vs. "understate"
"Downplay" often implies an intentional effort to minimize or dismiss ... Learn more →