en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Debunking "comprised solely of": why this phrase doesn't add up

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 05/10/2024, 03:07
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Comprised solely of or composed solely of. What's correct?

Redundancy error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often use "comprised of" thinking it is synonymous with "composed of", and adding "solely" seems to emphasize exclusivity. However, "comprise" itself inherently includes everything without needing "of" or "solely".

What is correct?

The word "comprise" should be used without "of" and without additional emphasis like "solely". It means "to consist of" or "to be made up of".

Examples of correct usage

  • The committee comprises ten members.
  • The collection comprises several rare artifacts.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Unraveling the "who's name" mystery: a common grammatical faux pas

Unraveling the "who's name" mystery: a common grammatical faux pas

People often confuse "who's" and "whose" because they sound similar. ... Learn more →

Why "laying on the couch" doesn't sit right

Why "laying on the couch" doesn't sit right

The error stems from the confusion between the verbs "lay" ... Learn more →

Why "untill" is a spelling slip-up

Why "untill" is a spelling slip-up

People often make this error due to confusion arising from ... Learn more →

Waking up to grammar: why "laying awake" is a mistake

Waking up to grammar: why "laying awake" is a mistake

People often confuse "lay" and "lie" because their past tenses ... Learn more →