en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Debunking "comprised solely of": why this phrase doesn't add up

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 05/10/2024, 03:07
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Comprised solely of or composed solely of. What's correct?

Redundancy error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often use "comprised of" thinking it is synonymous with "composed of", and adding "solely" seems to emphasize exclusivity. However, "comprise" itself inherently includes everything without needing "of" or "solely".

What is correct?

The word "comprise" should be used without "of" and without additional emphasis like "solely". It means "to consist of" or "to be made up of".

Examples of correct usage

  • The committee comprises ten members.
  • The collection comprises several rare artifacts.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "flush out a concept" doesn't hold water

Why "flush out a concept" doesn't hold water

The error occurs because "flush out" and "flesh out" sound ... Learn more →

Why "be apart of" keeps you aside: understanding this common grammatical error

Why "be apart of" keeps you aside: understanding this common grammatical error

People often confuse "apart" with "a part" because they sound ... Learn more →

Why "ground work" lays the wrong foundation

Why "ground work" lays the wrong foundation

People mistakenly separate the compound word "groundwork" into two words, ... Learn more →

Why "say me" is grammatically incorrect

Why "say me" is grammatically incorrect

People often make this error due to confusion between the ... Learn more →