en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Debunking "comprised solely of": why this phrase doesn't add up

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 05/10/2024, 03:07
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Comprised solely of or composed solely of. What's correct?

Redundancy error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often use "comprised of" thinking it is synonymous with "composed of", and adding "solely" seems to emphasize exclusivity. However, "comprise" itself inherently includes everything without needing "of" or "solely".

What is correct?

The word "comprise" should be used without "of" and without additional emphasis like "solely". It means "to consist of" or "to be made up of".

Examples of correct usage

  • The committee comprises ten members.
  • The collection comprises several rare artifacts.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "affects of" affects your grammar: common error explained

Why "affects of" affects your grammar: common error explained

People often confuse "affect" and "effect" because they sound similar. ... Learn more →

The problem with "I'm agree"

The problem with "I'm agree"

People often make this error due to direct translation from ... Learn more →

Why "allready" doesn't make the cut

Why "allready" doesn't make the cut

The error occurs due to a phonetic misconception. People often ... Learn more →

Why "has flew" doesn't fly: understanding proper verb conjugation

Why "has flew" doesn't fly: understanding proper verb conjugation

People often make this error due to confusion between simple ... Learn more →