en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Debunking "comprised solely of": why this phrase doesn't add up

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 05/10/2024, 03:07
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Comprised solely of or composed solely of. What's correct?

Redundancy error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often use "comprised of" thinking it is synonymous with "composed of", and adding "solely" seems to emphasize exclusivity. However, "comprise" itself inherently includes everything without needing "of" or "solely".

What is correct?

The word "comprise" should be used without "of" and without additional emphasis like "solely". It means "to consist of" or "to be made up of".

Examples of correct usage

  • The committee comprises ten members.
  • The collection comprises several rare artifacts.

Recommended posts in Grammar

A startling omission: why "suprise" needs its 'r'

A startling omission: why "suprise" needs its 'r'

People often make this error because the first "r" in ... Learn more →

Why "stoped" isn't stopping by your dictionary

Why "stoped" isn't stopping by your dictionary

The error occurs because of confusion about the rules for ... Learn more →

Why "followup" falls short of accuracy

Why "followup" falls short of accuracy

People often mistakenly combine "follow" and "up" into one word ... Learn more →

Why "should backup" needs a backup plan

Why "should backup" needs a backup plan

The phrase "should backup" is incorrect because "backup" is being ... Learn more →