en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Debunking "comprised solely of": why this phrase doesn't add up

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 05/10/2024, 03:07
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Comprised solely of or composed solely of. What's correct?

Redundancy error

Why do people make this mistake?

People often use "comprised of" thinking it is synonymous with "composed of", and adding "solely" seems to emphasize exclusivity. However, "comprise" itself inherently includes everything without needing "of" or "solely".

What is correct?

The word "comprise" should be used without "of" and without additional emphasis like "solely". It means "to consist of" or "to be made up of".

Examples of correct usage

  • The committee comprises ten members.
  • The collection comprises several rare artifacts.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Worse yet: why "more worse" is the worst

Worse yet: why "more worse" is the worst

People make this error when they try to add emphasis ... Learn more →

Why "supercede" needs to take a seat

Why "supercede" needs to take a seat

People often make this mistake because they associate the word ... Learn more →

Why "your welcome" doesn't quite greet correctly

Why "your welcome" doesn't quite greet correctly

People often hear the phrase "you're welcome" in spoken English ... Learn more →

Why "receive" isn’t spelled "recieve": a closer look at common confusion

Why "receive" isn’t spelled "recieve": a closer look at common confusion

The confusion between "i" and "e" often stems from the ... Learn more →