en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "should of" shouldn’t be: the grammar mistake explained

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 00:45
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Should of or should have. What's correct?

grammatical error

Why do people make this mistake?

The error is a result of the incorrect transcription of the spoken contraction "should've", which sounds very similar to "should of". People often misunderstand the contraction "should've" (short for "should have") and write it as "should of" due to the similar pronunciation.

What is correct?

The correct form is "should have", where "have" is the auxiliary verb used to form the perfect aspect.

Examples of correct usage

  • I should have known the answer.
  • You should have seen that movie.
  • They should have arrived by now.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "say me" is grammatically incorrect

Why "say me" is grammatically incorrect

People often make this error due to confusion between the ... Learn more →

The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray

The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray

People might make this error because "lead" and "read" in ... Learn more →

Despair over "dispair": spelling it out

Despair over "dispair": spelling it out

People often confuse "despair" with "dispair" due to the similar ... Learn more →

Why "old fashion way" isn't quite right

Why "old fashion way" isn't quite right

People might make this error due to a misunderstanding or ... Learn more →