en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "should of" shouldn’t be: the grammar mistake explained

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 00:45
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Should of or should have. What's correct?

grammatical error

Why do people make this mistake?

The error is a result of the incorrect transcription of the spoken contraction "should've", which sounds very similar to "should of". People often misunderstand the contraction "should've" (short for "should have") and write it as "should of" due to the similar pronunciation.

What is correct?

The correct form is "should have", where "have" is the auxiliary verb used to form the perfect aspect.

Examples of correct usage

  • I should have known the answer.
  • You should have seen that movie.
  • They should have arrived by now.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "a work out" needs a workout in grammar

Why "a work out" needs a workout in grammar

People often confuse the noun "workout" with the verb or ... Learn more →

Why "allready" doesn't make the cut

Why "allready" doesn't make the cut

The error occurs due to a phonetic misconception. People often ... Learn more →

Why "in vein" is a bloody mistake

Why "in vein" is a bloody mistake

People confuse "in vein" with the correct phrase "in vain" ... Learn more →

The linguistic misstep: avoiding the "one of most" blunder

The linguistic misstep: avoiding the "one of most" blunder

People might omit "the" due to a misunderstanding of the ... Learn more →