en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "should of" shouldn’t be: the grammar mistake explained

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 00:45
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Should of or should have. What's correct?

grammatical error

Why do people make this mistake?

The error is a result of the incorrect transcription of the spoken contraction "should've", which sounds very similar to "should of". People often misunderstand the contraction "should've" (short for "should have") and write it as "should of" due to the similar pronunciation.

What is correct?

The correct form is "should have", where "have" is the auxiliary verb used to form the perfect aspect.

Examples of correct usage

  • I should have known the answer.
  • You should have seen that movie.
  • They should have arrived by now.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "seperate" gets it wrong: a spelling insight

Why "seperate" gets it wrong: a spelling insight

The error occurs because the pronunciation of "separate" often makes ... Learn more →

The sudden truth about "all the sudden"

The sudden truth about "all the sudden"

People often mishear or conflate "all of a sudden" as ... Learn more →

Why "to login" doesn't log in: understanding a common grammar mistake

Why "to login" doesn't log in: understanding a common grammar mistake

People often treat "login" as a verb due to its ... Learn more →

Why "on accident" is an unfortunate mistake

Why "on accident" is an unfortunate mistake

The phrase "on accident" likely arose by analogy with "on ... Learn more →