en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "should of" shouldn’t be: the grammar mistake explained

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 05/10/2024, 00:45
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Should of or should have. What's correct?

grammatical error

Why do people make this mistake?

The error is a result of the incorrect transcription of the spoken contraction "should've", which sounds very similar to "should of". People often misunderstand the contraction "should've" (short for "should have") and write it as "should of" due to the similar pronunciation.

What is correct?

The correct form is "should have", where "have" is the auxiliary verb used to form the perfect aspect.

Examples of correct usage

  • I should have known the answer.
  • You should have seen that movie.
  • They should have arrived by now.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "laying on the couch" doesn't sit right

Why "laying on the couch" doesn't sit right

The error stems from the confusion between the verbs "lay" ... Learn more →

Roots of confusion: the "deep-seeded" error uncovered

Roots of confusion: the "deep-seeded" error uncovered

"Deep-seeded" sounds similar to the correct phrase and may lead ... Learn more →

Why "on accident" is an unfortunate mistake

Why "on accident" is an unfortunate mistake

The phrase "on accident" likely arose by analogy with "on ... Learn more →

Why "would of" doesn't work: understanding the common mistake

Why "would of" doesn't work: understanding the common mistake

This error arises because of the phonetic similarity between "would've" ... Learn more →