en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "would of" doesn't work: understanding the common mistake

Reviewed and edited by Anwar Kareem 23/10/2024, 08:15
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Would of or would have. What's correct?

grammatical/spelling error

Why do people make this mistake?

This error arises because of the phonetic similarity between "would've" (the contraction of "would have") and "would of". The pronunciation of "would've" can sound like "would of", leading people to incorrectly write "would of" instead of the correct form.

What is correct?

The correct form is "would have" or its contraction "would've".

Examples of correct usage

  • I would have gone to the store if I had known it was open.
  • She would've finished the project on time if she hadn't been delayed.
  • They would have won the game if they had practiced more.

Recommended posts in Grammar

"Basterd": the typo that thinks it’s edgy

"Basterd": the typo that thinks it’s edgy

People often misspell "bastard" as "basterd" because they spell the ... Learn more →

Why "there's two" doesn't count: a grammar guide

Why "there's two" doesn't count: a grammar guide

People often use "there's" (contraction of "there is") informally without ... Learn more →

Why "after been" is incorrect: a linguistic insight

Why "after been" is incorrect: a linguistic insight

People often confuse verb forms and may mistakenly use "been" ... Learn more →

"Wether" or not: clearing up the confusion

"Wether" or not: clearing up the confusion

People often confuse "wether" with "whether" because they sound similar ... Learn more →