en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "had shook" shakes up grammar

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 13/10/2024, 09:22
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had shook or had shaken. What's correct?

It's a grammatical error involving the misuse of verb tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People may confuse "shook" (the simple past tense) with "shaken" (the past participle) because the forms of irregular verbs can be challenging to remember.

What is correct?

The correct past participle of "shake" is "shaken". So the correct form for perfect tenses is "had shaken".

Examples of correct usage

  • She had shaken the bottle before opening it.
  • By the time he arrived, they had already shaken hands.
  • The earthquake had shaken the entire building.

Recommended posts in Grammar

The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray

The sneaky misstep: why "had mislead" leads us astray

People might make this error because "lead" and "read" in ... Learn more →

Famous mistake: why "is renown for" is incorrect

Famous mistake: why "is renown for" is incorrect

The error arises from confusion between the noun "renown" and ... Learn more →

Debunking "comprised of": why it doesn't add up

Debunking "comprised of": why it doesn't add up

People often use "comprised of" mistakenly because it sounds similar ... Learn more →

Why "en mass" is a common phrase mishap

Why "en mass" is a common phrase mishap

The error occurs because "en mass" is a phonetic misspelling ... Learn more →