en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "had shook" shakes up grammar

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 13/10/2024, 09:22
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had shook or had shaken. What's correct?

It's a grammatical error involving the misuse of verb tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People may confuse "shook" (the simple past tense) with "shaken" (the past participle) because the forms of irregular verbs can be challenging to remember.

What is correct?

The correct past participle of "shake" is "shaken". So the correct form for perfect tenses is "had shaken".

Examples of correct usage

  • She had shaken the bottle before opening it.
  • By the time he arrived, they had already shaken hands.
  • The earthquake had shaken the entire building.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "receive" isn’t spelled "recieve": a closer look at common confusion

Why "receive" isn’t spelled "recieve": a closer look at common confusion

The confusion between "i" and "e" often stems from the ... Learn more →

The problem with "to not to": a closer look

The problem with "to not to": a closer look

People often mistakenly use "to not to" by confusing the ... Learn more →

Why "weild" isn't in your dictionary

Why "weild" isn't in your dictionary

The error "weild" occurs because of a common confusion in ... Learn more →

"Free reign": breaking the chains of common misuse

"Free reign": breaking the chains of common misuse

People make this error because "reign" and "rein" are homophones—words ... Learn more →