en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "had shook" shakes up grammar

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 13/10/2024, 09:22
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had shook or had shaken. What's correct?

It's a grammatical error involving the misuse of verb tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People may confuse "shook" (the simple past tense) with "shaken" (the past participle) because the forms of irregular verbs can be challenging to remember.

What is correct?

The correct past participle of "shake" is "shaken". So the correct form for perfect tenses is "had shaken".

Examples of correct usage

  • She had shaken the bottle before opening it.
  • By the time he arrived, they had already shaken hands.
  • The earthquake had shaken the entire building.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "alongside with" doesn't stand together

Why "alongside with" doesn't stand together

People mistakenly believe that "alongside" and "with" together emphasize their ... Learn more →

Why "all though" is not a thoughtful choice

Why "all though" is not a thoughtful choice

People often mistakenly break the conjunction "although" into two separate ... Learn more →

What's wrong with "sunscream"

What's wrong with "sunscream"

The error occurs because the word "sunscreen" phonetically resembles "sunscream", ... Learn more →

What leads to the belief that back peddle is correct?

What leads to the belief that back peddle is correct?

People make this error because "pedal" and "peddle" are homophones—they ... Learn more →