en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "had shook" shakes up grammar

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 13/10/2024, 09:22
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had shook or had shaken. What's correct?

It's a grammatical error involving the misuse of verb tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People may confuse "shook" (the simple past tense) with "shaken" (the past participle) because the forms of irregular verbs can be challenging to remember.

What is correct?

The correct past participle of "shake" is "shaken". So the correct form for perfect tenses is "had shaken".

Examples of correct usage

  • She had shaken the bottle before opening it.
  • By the time he arrived, they had already shaken hands.
  • The earthquake had shaken the entire building.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Why "would of" doesn't work: understanding the common mistake

Why "would of" doesn't work: understanding the common mistake

This error arises because of the phonetic similarity between "would've" ... Learn more →

A magician’s secret: why "slight of hand" deserves a disappearing act

A magician’s secret: why "slight of hand" deserves a disappearing act

People often incorrectly hear or remember the phrase "sleight of ... Learn more →

Why "under going" is incorrect and how to use 'undergoing' properly

Why "under going" is incorrect and how to use 'undergoing' properly

The error "under going" is typically made due to the ... Learn more →

The curious misstep: why "since many years" misses the mark

The curious misstep: why "since many years" misses the mark

"Since many years" combines "since," which is used with specific ... Learn more →