en English es español fr française it italiano de deutsche ja 日本語 pl polski cs česky sv svenska tr Türkçe nl Nederlands

Why "had shook" shakes up grammar

Reviewed and edited by Lloyd Cooper 13/10/2024, 09:22
English.me team member

What kind of error is it?

Had shook or had shaken. What's correct?

It's a grammatical error involving the misuse of verb tense.

Why do people make this mistake?

People may confuse "shook" (the simple past tense) with "shaken" (the past participle) because the forms of irregular verbs can be challenging to remember.

What is correct?

The correct past participle of "shake" is "shaken". So the correct form for perfect tenses is "had shaken".

Examples of correct usage

  • She had shaken the bottle before opening it.
  • By the time he arrived, they had already shaken hands.
  • The earthquake had shaken the entire building.

Recommended posts in Grammar

Surely not: what's wrong with "shure"

Surely not: what's wrong with "shure"

The word "sure" is pronounced with an initial "sh" sound ... Learn more →

Why "in vein" is a bloody mistake

Why "in vein" is a bloody mistake

People confuse "in vein" with the correct phrase "in vain" ... Learn more →

Why "would of" doesn't work: understanding the common mistake

Why "would of" doesn't work: understanding the common mistake

This error arises because of the phonetic similarity between "would've" ... Learn more →

Don't say "wait me" — here's why

Don't say "wait me" — here's why

People often make this error due to direct translation from ... Learn more →